Mawari Verification Analysis

Evaluation of Mawari Network for Verified by DePIN Hub Program

---

Overview

This evaluation assesses Mawari Network against the Verified by DePIN Hub criteria. The project is scored across eight categories to determine its eligibility for verification.

---

1. Clarity of Problem-Solution Fit (10 Points)

Assessment:

• Problem Definition:
  • Challenges in delivering high-quality, real-time AR/VR experiences over existing mobile networks.
  • Latency and bandwidth limitations hinder seamless streaming of immersive content.
  • This issue impedes widespread adoption of AR/VR technologies.
• Solution:
  • Provides a cloud-based, decentralized content delivery platform optimized for XR streaming.
  • Utilizes edge computing and advanced compression technologies (Mawari Engine) to reduce bandwidth usage and minimize latency.
  • Enables delivery of high-quality, real-time immersive content to end-users regardless of device capabilities or network limitations.
• Target Customers:
  • XR Developers and Creators: Independent developers, creative studios, and enterprises building immersive content.
  • Content Companies: Focused on distributing immersive content for the spatial computing industry.
• Customer Pain Points:
  • Bandwidth Constraints: Difficulty streaming large XR content files smoothly.
  • Latency Issues: Need for low-latency solutions for real-time, interactive experiences.
  • Scalability Challenges: Obstacles in scaling content distribution without high costs.
  • Device Limitations: Desire to reach users on devices with limited processing capabilities.

Score: 14**/15**

Rationale: Mawari Network has a well-defined problem and offers a clear, innovative solution. The target customers and their pain points are thoroughly identified.

---

2. Competitor Analysis and Differentiation (10 Points)

Assessment:

• Competitors Identified:
  • NVIDIA CloudXR
  • Google Immersive Stream
• Competitive Advantage:
  • Unique Offering: The only Web3 network providing real-time orchestration of compute, bandwidth, and storage for spatial computing.
  • Mawari Engine: Proprietary codec enabling efficient streaming of high-quality AR content, likened to the "MP3 of AR."
  • True AR Streaming: Offers essential technology for streaming true AR experiences through SDKs for Unity and Unreal engines.
  • Decentralization: Leverages a decentralized network to optimize resources globally, enhancing scalability and reducing latency.
  • Web3 Integration: Ensures greater transparency, security, and user ownership compared to centralized solutions.
  • Scalability: Capable of streaming at scale without compromising performance.
• Limitations of Competitors:
  • NVIDIA CloudXR: Lacks specialized technology for true AR streaming; operates within a centralized framework.
  • Google Immersive Stream: Does not provide key technology for true AR streaming; centralization can lead to higher latency and less efficient resource use.

Score: 9/10

Rationale: Mawari Network demonstrates a strong understanding of its competitive landscape and articulates clear differentiators.

---

3. Revenue Model and Scalability (15 Points)

Assessment:

• Current Revenue Generation:
  • Initially bootstrapped since 2017.
  • Averaging $1.5 million in annual revenue from technology licensing fees.
  • Forecasted $1.2 million ARR for FY2024 and $5 million ARR for FY2025.
• Revenue Transparency:
  • Revenue activities are not conducted or reported on-chain yet.
  • Mainnet launch planned for Q1 2025.
• Scalability Strategy:
  • 2024: Bootstrapping supply through Node Sale; activation of infrastructure for network optimization.
  • 2025: Network optimization completed; acceleration of XR developer onboarding; beta programs and high-profile activations.
  • 2026: Expansion of GPU supply to support over 1,000 XR developers.
• Revenue Distribution to Token Holders:
  • Documentation not available/public as the Token Generation Event (TGE) is planned for Q1 2025.
  • Mechanisms for revenue sharing will be detailed upon release.

Score: 12/15

Rationale: While the project is generating revenue and has clear scalability plans, the lack of on-chain revenue reporting and detailed mechanisms for returning revenue to token holders limits the score. The upcoming node sale does seem optimistic, so that allows for positive forecasts

---

4. Hardware and Node Network Feasibility (10 Points)

Assessment:

• Hardware Deployment and Maintenance:
  • Responsibility is distributed among node operators.
  • Node Sale currently in progress to collaborate with infrastructure providers, offering node owners flexibility.
• Active Nodes:
  • Planned total of 100,000 Guardian Nodes.
  • Requires at least 50,000 active nodes in the first year (2025) to achieve full optimization.
• Data Source Verification:
  • No current data source or API link provided as the mainnet launch is planned for Q1 2025.
• Supply-Side Requirements:
  • Nodes require minimal hardware specifications, making it accessible for operators.
• Hardware Availability:
  • Hardware is readily available and easy to procure.
  • Options to run nodes on physical hardware at home or via cloud services.
• Hardware Costs and ROI:
  • Physical Hardware: Approximately $100 one-time investment.
  • Cloud Services: Around $120 annually.
  • A single node server can operate multiple instances, enhancing cost efficiency.
  • ROI estimates or calculation methodologies are not provided.

Score: 7**/10**

Rationale: The hardware and node network feasibility are promising, but the lack of current active nodes and verifiable data sources limits the score.

---

5. Team, Funding, and Endorsements (15 Points)

Assessment:

• Funding Stage and Amounts:
  • Seed Round (Q1 2023): Raised $6.5 million.
  • Seed+ Round (Q3 2024): Raised $10.8 million.
• Backers:
  • Reputable investors including 1kx, Anfield, Borderless Capital, Samsung Next, Animoca Brands, a16z, Outlier Ventures.
  • Notable angels like Sean Carey (Helium Co-Founder) and Joshua Frank (The Tie Co-Founder and CEO).
• Endorsements:
  • Partnerships and mentions from Samsung Next, T-Mobile, Solana Foundation.
  • Featured in respected publications like Forbes, VentureBeat, and The Block.
• Team Expertise:
  • Based on the information on the founders from LinkedIn, pitch deck and open sources, they have a strong background and relevant skills to make this project successful

Score: 13/15

Rationale: The project has strong financial backing and notable endorsements. Additional information on the team's expertise strengthens this category.

---

6. Tokenomics and Governance (10 Points)

Assessment:

• Tokenomics Model:
  • Project economics will be released by the end of 2024 with the Node Sale.
  • Documentation is not currently available as TGE is planned for Q1 2025.
• Governance Structure:
  • DAO structure is in the design phase.
  • Details to be announced in 2025 after TGE.
• Transparency:
  • Current lack of available documentation limits transparency.
  • Plans to release detailed information in the near future.

Score: 10**/15**

Rationale: Due to the unavailability of tokenomics and governance details, the score reflects the need for more transparency in these areas.

---

7. Roadmap and Milestones (10 Points)

Assessment:

• Project Roadmap:
  • 2024: Bootstrapping supply through Node Sale; activation of infrastructure.
  • 2025: TGE and network optimization; onboarding XR developers; beta programs and content partnerships.
  • 2026: Completion of optimization; expansion of GPU supply to support over 1,000 XR developers.
• Achievability:
  • Milestones are specific and time-bound.
  • Goals appear realistic based on the project's progress and industry trends.

Score: 9**/10**

Rationale: The roadmap is clear and achievable. Including detailed progress tracking mechanisms would enhance this category.

---

8. Transparency and References (10 Points)

Assessment:

• Data Availability:
  • Limited due to the project being in development stages.
  • Some references provided through articles and press releases.
• Social Media Presence:
  • Proper social media presence of the project and the team, where the information matches
• Operational Transparency:
  • Plans to release more information by the end of 2024.
  • Current transparency is limited by the unavailability of certain documents.

Score: 7**/10**

Rationale: While some transparency is present, the lack of accessible data and documentation affects the score.

---

Total Score: 81**/100**

---

Conclusion

Mawari Network has achieved a total score of 81 out of 100, which is at the minimum required score of 75 for verification.

• Meets or Exceeds Thresholds in All Categories
• Demonstrates Strong Viability and Alignment with Industry Best Practices

Recommendation: Approve Geodnet for the Verified by DePIN Hub badge.